Google, YouTube and copyright
In a nice place to move, Google recently purchased the popular video site YouTube, the question many are wondering how Google will manage the site kopieregskendings possible?
To show how much the Internet has changed in a relatively short period, it is important to look back at the last large public media, which has copyright issues. In this case we are talking about Napster. As you know, Napster was a system in which music can be shared by people whofree. These record labels and artists is obviously crazy. When people trade music free, royalties and did not produce income. To suppress the rebellion, the music industry went after Napster and even individual users, copyright claims that the musical pieces are violated. As you know, record companies struggle.
Now view YouTube. Almost all angles, YouTube seems to be the line of Napstervideo industry. The obvious difference is that many people simply upload their videos and creations on the website. In such circumstances, it is clear that no one can deny that there is a copyright violation, because people have voluntarily put on the site. The problem arises however when people continue to go to upload photos and other business television, DVD and so on. On the basis of several predecessors in the case of Napster, it appears that copyrightCredits can be directed against YouTube.
So why would Google purchase of YouTube risk? It 's really risk being sued to high heaven? Google maintains that all copyright issues are not a big deal, but rumors of its shares a story of a second. Depending on the media laws, Google will probably sell between $ 200 and $ 500 million U.S. dollars for claims of copyright. This is an absolute ton of money and represent a lack of faithGoogle copyright. So Google actually pay most of this money? The chances are slim. To understand why, we need an answer to what makes YouTube different from Napster?
Ironically, the law has not changed very significantly. The main thing is the difference between us as a community. Needless to say, the music industry has a shot at the front of public relations when he began to sue for childNapster litigation. The game process has led to a situation where companies start doing so, the tactics. In this connection, shown are the online music sites where you can buy individual songs a great success. Throw in the iPod and the future was clear. For groups of entertainment, the Internet is no longer a bad word.
Instead of trying to beat companies like YouTube with copyright claims, the animation groups find each otherfeasible solutions. Indeed, Google has already announced a deal like this, and we can expect much more in the future. There will still be copyright disputes? Sure, but should be fairly nominal. The real question is what will happen to the concept of copyright as applied to the network. Although not a psychic, I think I was almost out of line in the forecast will change dramatically over the next five to 10 years. In fact I am inclined to believe that the legal concept of copyright may be used byA set of more specific rules that apply only to the network. For many online sites, will be a positive step.
Filed under: YouTube Articles | Comments Off